Learning Delivery Trends: Class Remains in Session

Despite continually evolving technology and tightened budgets, traditional classroom-based instructor-led training and formal on-the-job training remain prevalent in today’s learning organizations.

Forty-one percent of learning executives indicated they continue to use classroom training as the primary learning delivery method, according to a report analyzing survey data from the Chief Learning Officer Business Intelligence Board (BIB) released this week.

In April, the editors of Chief Learning Officer surveyed the BIB, a group of nearly 1,500 professionals in the learning and development industry, to assess and benchmark learning delivery methods. The full analysis of the results was released Monday in “Focus on Learning Delivery,” a Chief Learning Officer report.

While classroom-based instructor-led training (ILT) continues to be the most commonly used delivery method, its use has decreased slightly over the past three years (from 44 percent in 2009 and 45 percent in 2008). Formal on-the-job training tied asynchronous e-learning for the second highest ranked instructional delivery method (18 percent), followed by synchronous e-learning (11 percent), text-based training (4 percent), satellite video (4 percent) and portable technology (1 percent).

ILT continues to be a popular choice among learning executives, but advances in technology and heightened budget consciousness are making both asynchronous and synchronous e-learning attractive.

BIB members reported that their use of asynchronous e-learning — combining self-study with asynchronous instruction — was driven by the flexibility of its self-paced format (52 percent), the ability to reach a large audience with few resources (47 percent) and cost savings over classroom learning (45 percent).

Cost savings also were important to synchronous e-learning users (55 percent), as was the value of student-instructor interaction in real time (28 percent).

Interestingly, at the height of the cost cutting and budget restrictions brought on by the recession in 2009, organizations indicated their use of more expensive ILT was driven not by cost but by corporate culture and the value of student-to-student interaction.